Although he was thronged by thousands of people in the principal cities of England, a key reason Hungarian nationalist and freedom fighter Lajos (Louis) Kossuth was so popular during his 1851-1852 visit to the United States was the American aversion to monarchy.

Kossuth, the figurehead of the 1848 Hungarian Revolution to overthrow the Habsburg Dynastyβs grip on that nation, was welcomed by massive crowds eager to listen to his republican-inspired orations. The New York Times noted in late 1851 that the βreception of the illustrious Kossuthβ¦ was such a scene as the world seldom beholds.β The newspaper also mentioned an ongoing public relations effort by European monarchist agents to discredit him:
“The events on Saturday indicated how utterly unavailing have been the efforts by Prussian and Austrian agents to convince the people that Kossuth did not fight for freedom, β that he struggle on behalf of the aristocracy, β and that the Emperor of Austria was the true champion of liberty and popular rights.”[1]
Detractors and Supporters
While most Americans did not believe the propaganda designed to discredit Kossuth, not everyone was impressed with him. William Lloyd Garrisonβs Liberator β a staunch antislavery and abolitionist Boston publication β pointed out the hypocrisy of Kossuth touring America and advocating for Hungarian independence while slavery still existed in the South:
“Behold the scenes now transpiring in New York, Philadelphia and Washington! Every influence brought to bear on Kossuth to make him bow and worship at the shrine of slavery. β¦He cares not about how many slaves are held by Republican America, provided the slaveholders βgive him hospitality,β and sympathize with Hungary.”[2]
Despite a few vocal critics, most Americans supported both Kossuth and the wave of European nationalist movements that exploded in 1848.[3] Secretary of State Daniel Webster even wrote a short book about him which included a letter of protest from the Austrian Empireβs ambassador, Johann Georg Hulsemann, claiming American statesman were criticizing Austriaβs βiron ruleβ and representing βthe rebel chief Kossuth as an illustrious manβ¦β

Webster responded that Americans were taking a keen interest in βthe prevalence on the other continent of sentiments favorable to republican liberty,β and that the alleged βpropagation of falsehoodsβ in U.S. newspapers β which sympathized with the republican revolutions β were βwholly dependent uponβ European sources. Websterβs book included an address βto the Peopleβ of the United States written by Kossuth while in exile:
“The Hungarians, more fortunate than I, who were able to reach the shores of the New World, were received by the people and Government of the United States in the most generous manner β yes, like brothers. With one hand they hurled anathema at the despots, and with the other welcomed the humble exiles to partake of that glorious American liberty more valued than the glitter of crowns.”[4]
Kossuth was honored to become the second foreigner after the Marquis de Lafayette to address the U.S. Congress, stayed at the White House with President Millard Fillmore over New Yearβs Eve, and even had a handful of small towns throughout the United States named after him. In sum, he was an icon because of the movement he represented. βLouis Kossuth is one of the great men of the day. Like Washington, Napoleon, Charles the Twelfth, Frederick the Great, and Alexander, he fills a brilliant page in historyβ¦ [and] occupies the heart of the republican world.β[5] In 1990, just before the end of the Cold War, the American Hungarian Federation erected a bust of Kossuth in the U.S. Capitol. The inscription: βFather of Hungarian Democracy, Hungarian Statesman, Freedom Fighter, 1848β1849.β
[1] New York Times, December 8, 1851.
[2] The Liberator, Boston, January 2, 1852. βRecreancy of Kossuthβ
[3] See: Jonathan Israel, The Expanding Blaze: How the American Revolution Ignited the World, 1775-1848 (Princeton; Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2017); Mike Rapport, 1848: Year of Revolutions (London: Hachette Digital, 2008).
[4] Daniel Webster, Sketch of the Life of Louis Kossuth, Governor of Hungary (New York: Stringer & Townsend, 1851), 86-91, 29. Chevalier J. G. Hulsemann, Charge dβAffairs at the Austrian Legation, Washington DC, to Daniel Webster, U.S. Secretary of State, Sept. 30, 1850. Webster to Chevalier, Dec. 21, 1850.
[5] The Washington Union, October 16, 1851.
About the author
Benjamin J. Swenson has been living and working in Korea since 2008. His doctoral dissertation at Pompeu Fabra University (UPF) in Barcelona, Spain, covered Euro-American military and legal history, and the advent of guerrilla warfare and counterinsurgency doctrine in the nineteenth century. He is currently an Assistant Professor in the Department for Human Creativity at Hoseo University in Asan β where he lives with his wife and son. His hobbies include chess, painting, hiking, and bonsai.
3 thoughts on “Antebellum Icon: Republicanism vs. Monarchy and Kossuth in America, 1851-1852”